Experiment+characterisation

Here you can see how you should always describe you experiements so that we can normalise the data.

The more you fill out the more efficient the UPED becomes:

//For example://

Experiment Number: //342// type of PMT : //1P28 Hamamatsu japan// Distance detector to sample (mm): //150// Size of the active detector area (mm^2 or mm x mm): //24 x 8// Scanned surface / sample surface (mm^2 or mm x mm) : //6.4 mm^2// Laboratory (location also): //Model Lab in Model Land// Operator (name and Email) : //Joe Op Joe@modellab.xy// Sample type : //ratskin// Age: //3 weeks// Filters used : //450nm long pass filter// state of the sample: //shaved and in PBS// Time of dark adaptation (min): //5 min// date of the measurement: //4.5.2010// type of measurement (SPE or DL) : //SPE// If DL : Illumination source / wavelenght / duration: - DC average ± stdev : //15.3 ± 3.8// Time gate (s) : //0.1 s// Length of the measurement (s): //600 s// Publication name and Journal: //UPE of rat skin. The journal for UPE research.// Comments: //The rat was starving for three days before the measurement//
 * File or the average ± stdev**